The Neo-Chasidus movement has garnered much attention in recent years. For some people it was a great surprise, seeming to have arisen suddenly, from the proverbial nowhere. They don't know what it really is, what its roots are, how to react to it. It is desirable, therefore, to spend some time examining its roots, to better understand where it came from, and what it represents.
A cute and clever moniker attached to it gives us an idea of what some of its main components are - חבקוק -ראשי תיבות חב"ד, ברסלב, (הרב אברהם יצחק) קוק, וי"א ג"כ (שלמה) קרליבך. In English, Chabakuk, standing for Chabad, Breslov, (Rav Avraham Yitzchak) Kook, (Shlomo) Carlebach).
The Chabad component, which comes first in this sobriquet, is indeed a great foundation of Neo-Chasidus. If not first and foremost, definitely one of the great parts of it.
Let us look at the deep connection between Chabad-Lubavitch and Neo-Chasidus, starting with some background on some of the leading personalities of the movement.
Rabbi Moshe Weinberger of Woodmere, NY, is perhaps the leader of the movement in the English speaking world. Though he is of Hungarian Jewish background, he has a deep connection to Chabad-Lubavitch. Starting in his teens, when he was introduced to it by a local businessman who took him other local teens to Farbrengens in Crown Heights, in the early 1970's למספרם (Bashevkin interview, 14:50-). He was drawn to it "like a magnet", in his words, and spent much time at their headquarters, hanging out at 770 Eastern Parkway for years, attending farbrengens, and learning a lot of Chabad Chasidus. He has related that at one time he "was probably very, very close to becoming a Lubavitcher Chasid" himself. Later, he spent much time at a Chabad-Lubavitch outreach center, Heichal Menachem, in the Boro Park section of Brooklyn, where he heard many shiurim from the late Chabad-Lubavitch mashpia, R. Yoel Kahn. He davens from a Nusach Ari (Chabad-Lubavitch) siddur. He regularly lights a public Chabad-Lubavitch menorah during Chanukah in the Five Towns area of NY. All those years of deep Lubavitch connection and engagement left a profound impression on him and his thinking, even if he doesn't call himself a Lubavitcher now.
Rebbe Judah Mischel, a disciple of Rebbe Weinberger, is a well-known disseminator of Neo-Chasidus via his positions at Camp HASC, NCSY, writings, and speeches. He is also the son of a Chabad-Lubavitch mekurav (and here). In recent years he has visited Crown Heights, meeting and conferring with Lubavitch leaders, and later tweeting about it (as reported here previously, though the tweet referenced was later deleted).
R. Yussie Zakutinsky, leader of a Neo-Chasidic congregation in Lawrence, student at Rabbi Weinberger's Emek Hamelech kollel, also has a family background closely connected to Chabad-Lubavitch.
All of the above are heavily influenced by Chabad-Lubavitch.
The Chabad-Lubavitch influence on Neo-Chasidus is not just theological however.
Another aspect is seen in stories and music used by it. Here is one good example, that covers both the music and theology departments, Neo-Chasidim dancing enthusiastically to a signature Chabad-Lubavitch song. Many Lubavitch songs are sung in Neo-Chasidic circles.
Interestingly, though, despite the deep ties and influence, there is a significant element of distance and tension in the relationship between Neo-Chasidus and Chabad-Lubavitch nevertheless, that is worth noting. And that is, due to the fact that despite pleasure on the Chabad-Lubavitch side to see some Modern Orthodox and others turning in a Chasidic direction via Neo-Chasidus, they are still disappointed that they have not become Lubavitchers. In the Chabad-Lubavitch view, they are the highest form of Chasidus, and their Rebbe is the נשיא הדור, leader of the generation. While Neo-Chasidus draws deeply upon Chabad-Lubavitch, they do not feel bound to and by it, and imbibe from other Hasidic streams as well.
The component of Chabad-Lubavitch in Neo-Chasidus is not something small that could perhaps be (figuratively) בטל בששים, nullified when heavily outweighed. It is an עיקר, a large, main component, and also נותן טעם, imparting much flavor. So in a way, it (Neo-Chasidus) could be considered a branch or offshoot of Chabad-Lubavitch (perhaps similar to the מלאכים Chasidic group of Williamsburg in NY). People should keep that in mind when considering the movement.
May הקב"ה help us see things clearly, as they actually are, to reach the correct conclusions about them, and approach things with the proper מהלך.
א גוטען חודש
The question which strikes me is why people are attracted to these movements. Now let me clarify my point. I'm close to Rabbi on the LES who's Chassidish. His grandfather was a Godol who was very close to Rav Moshe. When I spend Shabbosim on the LES I greatly enjoy his Chassidish Torah. This said when I hear Chassidus I find it absolutely meaningless. I told this to a Lubavicher and he commented, "You need to hear more." I like to think that I'm open minded but their stuff strikes me as nothing more than drivel. Last week my son read Yochanan Gordon's article in the FTJT. This Baal Gaavah fancies himself an expert in Niglah and Nistar and of course basketball. When my son finished he remarked, "He didn't say anything." I think that says it all. Chassidus is for Jews who want an empty relationship with Hashem and the Torah
ReplyDeleteThanks for your interesting and typically provocative comment. ;-)
ReplyDeleteThe question is, what is "Chassidus" and what is "Chassidishe Torah". Some "Chassidishe Torah" is okay, nice, it can qualify as a variety of drush. But it needs to be evaluated by general standards for vetting Torah. If it passes, fine. But if it is just some feel-good fantasy, not grounded in reality, or some vague high-sounding talk that doesn't make sense upon closer examination, it needs to be rejected, no matter how lofty it might seems initially, or how long the beard of the author is. Some Chasidim and Chasidishe Rebbes are gedolei Torah, and some of their Torah is acceptable. But just because a label of "Chassidus" is attached to something does not exempt it from scrutiny and debate, which is an integral part of the process Jewish people partake in as part of לימוד והבנת התורה.
I can vouch for that Chassidish Torah.This Rabbi's grandfather knew Shas with all Tosafos by heart so he wouldn't say anything questionable. What I mean by Chassidish Torah is finding Mussar in the verses using Drush. The people this Rabbi quotes were of impeccable character and they meet my truthometer. What I have no use for is the gobbledygook you hear from people who pretend that they're experts in Kabbalah.
ReplyDeleteI'd like to address your post from a different perspective. The "neos" study Chassidus because they're drawn to it and therefore they're attracted to all types of Chassidus. On the other hand, Chabad learns Chassidus as part of its plan to spread its brand across the world. Several months ago I mentioned that Rivka Slonim related that when she was a little girl she went to camp and was taught the following song,"From 770 we're marching out, on to victory there is no doubt". Chabad tells everyone that it wants to spread Torah around the world, but that's not its true goal. Therefore there may be some overlap in the two groups but they really don't have that much in common.
ReplyDelete