Wednesday, October 24, 2018

NCSY Heads to Uman

NCSY is a well known youth movement in the Modern Orthodox community, which has brought many young people closer to Judaism and Torah for decades. It has also garnered support from segments of the more right wing "Yeshiva World" at times as well.

Lately, however, they evidently are increasingly under the influence of the neo-Hasidic segment of Modern Orthodoxy. This recently became more prominent, front and center, with the appointment of neo-Chasidus leader Rabbi Judah Mischel as Mashpia (a Chasidic title/position seemingly created there for him, as was created for his mentor, neo-Chasidus leader Rabbi Moshe Weinberger, at YU-RIETS a few years back) of NCSY (see also here).

It is important to understand that this is not just some low level appointment. Rather, it is a pivotal new development, as it is reported that he will be working closely with all levels of NCSY staff and dispensing guidance.

Surprisingly though (or perhaps not surprisingly), the OU doesn't mention explicitly, or detail his neo-Chasidism in their announcements of it. It seems that they are trying to hide it, flying under the radar, to make it like he is just some neutral inspirational mainstream Orthodox figure, rather than one of the top neo-Chasidic leaders.

Who is Rabbi Judah Mischel?

Rabbi Judah Mischel is a person who has transformed Camp HASC (where he is executive director) in the last few years into a major platform for the promotion of neo-Chasidus among young people, and now, with his elevation at NCSY, is in position to do more of the same there, this time with the reach, prestige and influence of the O-U behind him. He is someone who regularly goes to Uman for Rosh Hashanah and promotes that to others as well. He also has significant personal, as well as family, ties to Lubavitch. He founded an organization called Tzama Nafshi, which works to spread neo-Chasidus among the Modern Orthodox, by means such as a special tour to graves of famous Chasidic Rebbes in Europe.

This a significant departure from the O-U and NCSY's past. Is NCSY, the National Council of Synagogue Youth, becoming NCSY, Neo Chasidic Synagogue Youth? This is something worthy of examination, discussion, and thought.

This great shift at NCSY should be taken into account by OU members and officials, parents, donors, young people, people connected to NCSY, and any concerned community member. Is the OU now willingly becoming a vehicle to lead young people, the future of the community, away, in a different direction, to neo-Chasidus?

To get an idea of the mentality involved, a relevant illustration is a statement Rabbi Mischel made a few months ago - "There are three places that attract and unite Jews from all walks of life" he said, "Uman on Rosh Hashana, Meron on Lag Baomer, and Camp HASC."

Wait, you may say, what about the Kosel Maaravi? ירושלים עיה"ק, the city that Chazal said unites Yidden? No. He says the three places are Uman, Meron, and Camp HASC.

Well, if you want to try something new, what can I do, but personally, I am old-fashioned, and choose ירושלים.

Reb Mischel is known for stunts and merrymaking. But what may be popular in a summer camp environment is not necessarily what is desirable year round for searching youth.

How did Mischel get his new job? I am not privy to all the deliberations, but it is known that O-U Executive VP Allen Fagin is close to and has a very warm relationship with neo-Chasidus leader (the man Mischel calls his captain) Rabbi Moshe Weinberger (we have discussed Rabbi Weinberger and some of his controversial statements here in the past). A few months ago when Rabbi Weinberger had a special breakfast for his new Emek Hamelech institute, Fagin was there, sat on the dais, and exchanged kisses with Weinberger after the program. Weinberger gave effusive recognition and thanks to him for coming then, as well as being available when called in general, despite his busy schedule, in the beginning of his talk. It is not just Allen Fagin himself, however, it is a deeper, more extensive, family connection. Fagin's son is a longtime neo-Hasid and congregant of Rabbi Weinberger. In a video from the recent first selichos pre-Rosh Hashanah 5779 at Aish Kodesh, for example, Fagin family members can be clearly seen in the foreground (some in Hasidic garb, Mr. Allen Fagin himself in a light blue shirt, at the left of his son) extensively (he/they can be seen in some previous similar videos as well). So there is a deep relationship there. Hence it is quite logical to wonder if Mr. Fagin himself is lending a hand to the promotion of neo-Chasidus at the O-U/NCSY (of course, there are some others there as well under that influence, such as R. Bashevkin of NCSY, but he doesn't seem to be into Uman as R. Muschel is, or as extreme. Additionally, there is a difference between if there is one or few neo-Chasidic leaders in an organization, and if there are multiple such individuals).

Be that as it may or may not be, the point is that major change is under way at NCSY, and people should be made aware of it. An unacknowledged stealthy major change in orientation breeds suspicion and does not inspire trust. We don't want parents complaining in the future that Rabbi Mischel and NCSY made their children into neo-Chasidim.

Let us have some honesty, transparency, and forthrightness about the situation, rather than obfuscation and euphemisms.

The O-U Kashrus division is an industry leader due to its great staff of dedicated Torah scholars in the mainstream of the community. It would be logical for other divisions of the O-U, such as NCSY, to proceed in such a path as well, taking advantage of wise counsel of established senior תלמידי חכמים, rather than going בעצת נערים, with the fads of the youth, even if the latter are more popular on social media. Social media is not, and should not be, our guiding light.

May Hashem help us proceed on the right path and avoid pitfalls.

10 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting this. Teen are looking for spiruality as is the OU (if you have read anyone by their current president, Moishe Bane, you would see this is part of mission is to add ruchnius and meaning to frum life). In fact having someone who can help foster that and spread it among NCSY advisors is an amazing thing. I am curious if you are also again NCSYers singing songs by Shlomo Carlebach or any shul of chasuna using a Carlebach niggun?

    ReplyDelete
  2. R. Bashevkin is a clean-shaven, neo-hassidic wannabee. I, on the other hand, have been infiltrating the Union with neo-hassidic propaganda for years. As of late, I was sounding rams horns in the office - during working hours! I am extremely upset and disappointed by your lack of mention, and frankly, lack of journalism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wait, so I don't get it. What's wrong with neo-Chassidus? I get that you're a litvak, but I don't understand based on your blog why Neo-Chassidus is a bad thing. Because of Mischel's kotel comment? I'm just trying to understand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you go through older posts, you could get a better idea.

      They are disseminating an old canard that non-Chasidic Yiddishkeit - call it Litvish or some other appropriate moniker - is חיצוני, external, lacking penimiyus and passion, and hence not worthy. According to them פנימיות התורה = חסידות. So the Chofetz Chaim, The Vilna Gaon, Rav Steinman, etc., etc., etc., were incomplete and superficial Yidden, lacking "inner Torah", because they were not Chasidim?

      Furthermore, they are promoting this slanderous canard among naive, uneducated youth, especially in the Modern Orthodox community.

      That is חוצפה נוראה.

      (Of course they will sometimes throw in a Litvishe vort, or talk about a Litvishe gadol to make a show of impartiality, of not being partisan, but basically their message is as above, that Chasidus = inner, spiritual, heartfelt Yiddishkeit, and Litvish = cold, superficial, rote observance.

      Let's not play around here, let us be honest. :)

      Delete
    2. It's true though that litvishism today is just depressing.

      Delete
    3. Litvishism? Huh? What's that?

      The Litvishe way is real and empowering. It is not fantasizing and imagining things that don't exist.

      Delete
  4. Hashem should bless you, Mr. Litvak. Other people are concerned about silly issues, like anti-Semitism, the day school financial crisis, and the huge numbers of Modern Orthodox kids going off the derech. But you have focused on the REAL issue - those outrageous Jews who dare to turn off Netflix for a few minutes to study the works of sketchy Rabbis like Rav Levi Yitzchak of Berditchev and the Piacetzner!

    Also, it's good you called out Rabbi Mischel for his insult of Yerushalayim. That's obviously what he intended (the fact that he made aliyah, sends his children to religious zionist schools and regularly visits Yerushalayim are all an elaborate cover). I suspect that Rabbi Mischel and his followers actually face Uman when they daven. Even when they are in Uman.

    Keep writing Mr. Litvak - the masses await your insight!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the blessing! :)

    ב"ה we are an עם חכם ונבון, and have the capacity to think about more than one problem a year, or even more than one problem a month. So the issue of whether the OU should be promoting neo-Chasidus is also something concerned Yidden can give thought to on occasion.

    The fact is that this post has gotten a great amount of hits, either the most, or one of the most, of any in the history of this site. It must have resonated or touched a nerve with many people to gain such wide attention. I daresay that it has a ring of truth to it, even if perhaps not every detail, or speculation is 100% accurate.

    Something major is happening, a potentially major shift, and responsible Jews should look at it closely.

    Making believe that the O-U promoting a leading neo-Chasidic evangelist as Mashpia is nothing new but just business as usual is not being honest, and deceptive as well.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is childish posts like this that inspire people to learn Chassidut. Of all the many issues threatening the religious Jewish world this is what you pick on? It is this level of Sinat Achim that caused the destruction of the Bet Hamikdash.
    Shameful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is shameful is your trying to stifle and silence legitimate debate.

      חילוקי דעות is part of Yiddishkeit.

      Delete