Wednesday, August 4, 2021

Redoing the Rebbe's Choizer - Lubavitch Scholar Reb Yoel Kahn Gets a Posthumous Makeover

 Recently, a leading, iconic Chabad-Lubavitch figure, Reb Yoel Kahn, known as the Choizer of their late Rebbe, passed away. In the wake of his passing, Lubavitch reaped a PR bonanza, with much of the frum media (even an English language newspaper calling itself Yated Ne'eman🤣) publishing glowing obituaries of him, portraying him as a great scholar and teacher. The New York Times (with whom Lubavitch has a long relationship) as well, published an obituary hewing to the official Lubavitch PR line (though interestingly, in the course of it, they described Chabad-Lubavitch as a "missionary movement", something I doubt Lubavitch PR was crazy about).

However, one major thing was typically left out in the mainstream media that I saw, namely Reb Yoel's role in, and relationship to, Chabad-Lubavitch messianism. It was as if they (the Chabad-Lubavitch PR machine, and their fellow travelers) endeavored to present an airbrushed portrait of Reb Yoel to the world at large, as if it didn't exist at all, as if he had absolutely no connection to it. Since people are being dangerously misled by that omission, about Reb Yoel and about Chabad-Lubavitch in general, it is important to set the record straight about it.

People should know that Reb Yoel was involved in promoting the late Rebbe as Moshiach quite openly toward the end of the last Rebbe's life. A photo seen online (h/t:H1) after his passing shows this quite clearly.  


In the photo, Reb Yoel is seen at a podium with the words יחי מלך המשיח and a photo of his Rebbe on its face, next to his brother-in-law Lubavitch Rabbi and ardent messianist Shmuel Butman, well-known Lubavitch Rabbi and Tanya broadcaster Yossel Weinberg, and others.

For more on Reb Kahn's messianism, Wikipedia and Chabadpedia are quite revealing. When one looks at the English Wikipedia on him, it is totally missing. Presumably thanks to the Chabad-Lubavitch PR machine. In the Hebrew Chabadpedia on him, however, a much different picture is seen. In the section entitled דעותיו, toward the bottom of the entry, much information is given there about his fervent messianism. It says that it continued after the passing of his Rebbe, however, he felt that it should not be publicized outside Chabad circles after that point.

Also instructive in this regard are two videos from close to thirty years ago featuring Reb Kahn speaking fervently, showing how strongly Reb Kahn was involved in promoting the late Rebbe as Moshiach. The first one, just recently revealed to the public at large, can be seen here. Another one, that has generally been available longer evidently, is available here.
 
Another interesting and important thing to note in the Chabadpedia entry on Reb Yoel can be seen about halfway down the page, in the section entitled מסעות בקרב גדולי תורה. There it talks about journeys of his to various gedolim for PR and propaganda purposes, to increase acceptance of Chabad-Lubavitch in the frum world, a deceptive act in which גדולי ישראל, גדולי ומנהיגי הדור were cynically used for Chabad propaganda.

The bottom line is that people should know that yes, Reb Kahn was a great Lubavitcher scholar, but no, his beliefs, particularly that his late Rebbe was/is Moshiach, and his deceptive visits to gedolim, were/are beyond the pale, and totally unacceptable, and we therefore need to continue to firmly and resolutely maintain our distance from him and them.

P.S. For those who think that such beliefs are a thing of the past, especially among the establishment of the officially "non-messianist" Chabad-Lubavitch, just a few days ago, one of the leading Lubavitch establishment figures, R. Moshe Kotlarskyprayed openly for the return of the late Rebbe, who he called " נשיא דורנו", to bring the redemption.

In the זכות of rejecting the false PR machine narratives, and following the דרך התורה הצרופה המסורה לנו מדור דור, may we be zoche to the coming of משיח האמיתי, במהרה בימינו, אמן.

5 comments:

  1. I was talking to a friend recently and I asked him the following,"Why do we find that there were Germans who opposed Hitler in spite of the inherent dangers of taking such a position? In contrast, no Lubavicher is willing to come out and call a spade a spade when it comes to the Rebbe." Yes they'd be ostracized in the community, but it could be done anonymously on line. The answer, I think, is obvious. Those Germans who didn't fall in line with their countrymen never accepted the maniac's rantings, therefore the only issue that they had to deal with was loss of parnassah or even life. In the case of Chabad dealing with the reality that the Rebbe was nothing more than a false Messiah would mean that they'd have to face the simple truth that they were duped. We seen then that a person is less afraid of being killed than of admitting he was wrong. And this is totally consistent with the behavior evinced by the Shabtai Tzviniks. Avos teaches that this world is preparatory for the next. I think this means that we have to train ourselves to become receptive to the truth, but from my experience this is too difficult a task for most to handle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am uncomfortable with such an analogy, but leaving that aside for the moment, from what I know it is not correct, as there are Lubavitchers that have come out against the messianism, although some of those were decades ago, and people may have forgotten them already. One example is a fellow Moshe Friedman I recall from years ago. See here https://chassidusunlimited.tripod.com/goodresolution.html

      Delete
  2. It is hard to blame Reb Yoel during the Lubavitcher Rebbe's lifetime for believing that his Rebbe was Moshiach. That was the message that was transmitted from Rebbe to chossid. I understand Reb Yoel retracted after the Lubavitcher Rebbe passed away.

    Regardless, vis-a-vis Reb Yoel, and all Lubavitchers who believed wholeheartedly before "3 Tamus" that the Rebbe was Mashiach, you should articulate why that belief was problematic.

    During the height of the messianic fury (pre- 3 Tamus), Rav Shach was given Maphtir and when he said the brochos of על כסאו לא ישב זר he burst in tears. That being said, we believe that the notion that the Melech Hamoshiach was/is the Lubavitcher Rebbe is a big zilzul; notwithstanding the Rebbe's maylos. He was a great man, but claiming that he is the Messiah is an insult to Klall Yisroel.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it's somewhat misguided to focus on the Moshiach issue. It's as if we're saying that Meshichistas are bad and non Meshichistas are good. There are other, at least as equally disturbing matters that must be addressed, the belief that the Rebbe was a Novi Mamash, the dismissal of all non Lubavich Rabbis and the conviction that the Nasi Hador must be Lubavich are three which immediately come to mind. Somehow a message must get through to Chabad that the Rebbe was a great man who accomplished a tremendous amount but it's time to move on from his Messianic dream because it's nothing short of Kefirah and or Christianity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Add Rabbi Efrem Goldberg to the list of Chabad's "useful idiots." (non Lubavichers who wax poetic over Chabad.) In his Dvar Torah on Parshas Reeh Rabbi Goldberg spoke about great Rabbis like Rav Moshe and Rav Pam who gained fame as Torah leaders despite the fact that they shunned the limelight. Then he cited the Rebbe who refused the Nesius for a year as another example of a Torah giant who wasn't interested in fanfare. My question for the group, "Did the Rebbe really have no desire at first to take over?"

    ReplyDelete